Why did they pull the article down?
Why aren’t they putting it back up?
Is the CEO the Huffington Post somehow implicated?
These are just a few the questions surrounding the Huffington Post’s extremely suspicious removal an article critical Spotify.
+ The Huffington Post Rips Down an Article Sharply Criticizing Spotify — Here’s the Original
The Huffington Post — or ‘HuffPost’ as it’s now called — originally removed a contributor’s article about Spotify. They cited a violation its editorial policies. Specifically, the publication stated that it was unable to verify an interaction between the article’s author — Blake Morgan — and members Spotify’s staff.
The conversation itself was unflattering the Spotify employees. The article was also resoundingly critical the way the streaming platform treats artists.
Morgan subsequently pointed to numerous independent verifications the conversation. But by that point, numerous copies the original article were going viral, and the Huffington Post’s reasoning looked fishy.
HuffPo CEO Jared Grusd’s role has also been called into question, specifically given his previous employment at the streaming giant.
+ Turns Out Huffington Post’s CEO Used to Work for Spotify
Specifically, critics questioned whether Grusd himself called for the removal. Grusd was formerly General Counsel and Global Head Corporate Development at Spotify, with friendly ties back to the company (see above). The previous employment also raises questions financial ties and conflicts interests, including the possibility that Grusd has a tranche Spotify options or shares.
Early Wednesday afternoon, a HuffPost representative denied that Grusd played any role in the removal. Here’s the statement fered by Caitlin O’Neill HuffPost’s owner Oath, Inc., itself owned by Verizon Communications.
“As CEO, Jared Grusd is not involved in editorial decisions at HuffPost. This post was self published on our contributors platform. It was flagged by our editorial team, and after deciding it did not meet our standards, was removed per our contributor terms use.”
Accordingly, we asked why the piece hasn’t been reinstated given independent verifications obtained by Blake Morgan. O’Neill has not yet responded.